Our business
philosophy is
simple:
"You can get
anything in life you
want... by helping enough other
people get what they
want!"
The Solutions
Network...
a unique company
that is always free
to join and always free to
earn.
Click Here to join
now... for free!
|
The reality is that a compelling scientific,
logical, factual case for a
Creator and for the divinity of
Christ can be made.
Actually, this case can be made,
at least, as compelling as or
even more so than the case that
the atheists make against
religion. A scientific,
fact based case for God and
Christ is what we will be
presenting. I
don't expect any ardent atheist
will complete this and promptly
go to church. I do hope,
however, it will get them
thinking.
Once we start thinking for
ourselves rather than just
lapping up the naturalistic
pabulum that was fed to us in
high school and even college, we
can not help but say "hmm, I'm
not sure that makes sense, let
me examine that a bit more"...
The goal here is not to convert. It's
to provide the many facts that
are hidden from so many, as I
now know they were hidden form
me,
in an attempt to take God our of
our society. Everyone has a
right to their own opinions and
beliefs. But most people want
to know their opinions are based
on reality, on actual facts... not
just the information that has
been selectively picked in an
attempt to lead us to the belief
that society thinks is
appropriate. We all have the
right to believe we want. I
just think that we have an
obligation to ourselves to know
that those believes flow from
actual facts.
|
|
*
WHAT'S
TAUGHT- The
Miller
experiment
of the early
‘60s, which
purported to
show how the
first living
cell could
have been
created
under the
circumstances
of the earth
at that
time. It
didn't.
o FACT:
It is now understood that the
process formulated within the
experiment could
not have possibly achieved the
purported result.
But that doesn't matter... It is
still being taught. The
more we learn, the more we
realize we can't even begin to
understand the creation of the
simplest first cell. It
has been proven by scientists
and statisticians, (even those
that are atheists), that it
simply could not have happened
by accident. Even the
simplest cell is simply too
complicated. Still, that
is what is taught.
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT- Hackles
Embryos- Our children and even
college students are shown "actual"
research drawings of early
embryonic development that
supposedly prove the theory of
evolutionary decent. The
drawings are known to be
frauds!
o FACT:
It has been known for years that
these drawings were, in fact, fabricated
and selectively chosen to
support the theory and do
not represent reality. These
drawings were so compelling that
based on this evidence alone, many
believers became atheists. Even
though the entire research and
data is known to be fraudulent, they
are still taught as fact!
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
It has been "proven"
that we came from monkeys via
compelling drawings based on
fossils of the evolution of man.
They
have been shown to be, no more
than subjective incorrect
artists interpretations.
o FACT:
The Drawings that we have all
seen, showing the gradual
evolution of monkey to man, are
nothing more than artists
speculation based on the
flimsiest of fossils (For
example, Java
man consisted of a scull cap, 3
teeth and on thigh bone).
Throughout the entire fossil
record, no true intermediary
species i.e. missing link has
yet been found.
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
Archaeopteryx- is an exceptional
"proof" of Darwinism. It
is now know to be false, but
still taught as such.
o FACT:
It has been shown and is almost
universally agreed that this
"missing link" between dinosaurs
and birds is a product of
wishful thinking, and is not an
intermediary missing link, just
an interesting animal. Similar
to the fact that no one believes
that the duck billed platypus is
a transitional stage of anything.
However, this
is still taught as proof of
evolution.
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
We are taught that the fossil
record supports Darwin's theory
of evolution. The
record is FATALLY incomplete!
o FACT:
The more complete the fossil
record becomes, the less and
less it supports the theory of
evolution. In actuality,
the fossil record does not
remotely show the predicted
gradual intermediary forms that
step by step should lead to
modern forms. In fact, as
the Cambrian explosion has
shown, the more we find, the
more it appears that most life
forms came about rapidly with no
intermediary forms. Simply
put, if looked at objectively,
it much more clearly supports
creation than evolution. This
is a fact, but not one that is
taught.
The facts and obvious
implications of the Cambrian
explosion are never fully
taught anywhere within our
school system..
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
The accidental development of
life is a predictable certainty.
Absolutely,
false!
o FACT:
The formation of the first
living cell by random chance has
been shown to be a statistical
impossibility. Even
the most ardent atheistic
biologist agrees on this point. Furthermore,
the universe
was unmistakably created for
life. Everything from the
infinitesimal strong and weak
forces of the atom to the
gargantuan forces of gravity
were finely tuned for life.
If these natural forces were
even slightly greater or weaker, no
life of any sort
could possibly have existed.
It is so finely tuned on so many
levels that the chance of it
being mere random chance is
impossible. This statement is
not in dispute by anyone. The
only question is how and why it
could have happened. This
was the genesis of the
"multi-verse" theory i.e. if
there are an infinity number of
universes, one had to be like
ours. We just happened to be
the lotto winner! However,
there is ZERO actual evidence of
other universes, let alone an
infinite number of them. To
me, this seems just another
theory propounded to take the
possibility of God out of the
equation. A simple question...
if, as
it appears, there really are
not an
infinite number of
universes... Was this impossibly
perfect crafting of every aspect
of the entire universe really
just a random, lucky
for us, accident?
Or is there a purpose for the
universe and for us?
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
Some actually assert that Christ
never existed. This
is an absurd statement.
o FACT:
Christ lived; there is
an incontrovertible historical
record of his life and death.
There are more, independent of
the Bible, mentions and
descriptions of Jesus than of
Caesar! Multiple mentions of
Christ and the Christians, by
multiple ancient historians. No
serious scholar believes he
didn't exist. However, this
absurd claim gets a lot of "air
play". This is but another
absurd theory propounded to take
the possibility of God out of
the equation. One can
rationally argue against the
deity of Christ (I
think they'd be wrong, but not
necessarily irrational),
but to argue that he didn't
exist speaks either to
irrationality or dishonesty.
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
Some assert
that even if
Christ did exist
and was crucified, he either did
not die, or was stolen from his
burial place in order to
perpetuate the "legend" of his
divinity. Logically
this is not a supportable
position.
o FACT:
Christ was crucified and
objective evidence suggests he
was resurrected. The
actions of the apostles, at
first denying even knowing him,
then believing with such
certainty that they were willing
to pay with their own lives, in
order to spread His word.
This indicates nothing else.
Would they have knowingly died
for a lie? Furthermore...
o In
fact, (as
detailed later), Some of the
most brilliant minds of our
time, thoroughly examined the
evidence with the intent to
"disprove" the resurrection and
destroy Christianity once and
for all. The result? After
examining all the available
evidence the came up with the
opposite conclusions and became
Christians. As a
direct result of their objective
analysis of facts discovered in
their attempt to disprove
Christ's divinity, the
result was that they gave their
life to Christ.
* WHAT'S
TAUGHT-
Many claim that the Bible and
it's history is mostly an
interesting story of religious
legend. Not
a supportable position.
o FACT:
I personally don't know that I
subscribe to bible
infallibility, but I do know
that 100's of years and
generations before the birth of
Christ, his life, his death, his
betrayal and resurrection were
foretold in various
portions of the bible. Also,
the more archaeologists compare
the bible to actual historical
finds, the more the bible holds
up as accurate.
